NAAC IIQA SSR CRITERION 1 CRITERION 2 CRITERION 3 CRITERION 4 CRITERION 5 CRITERION 6 CRITERION 7 EXTENDED PROFILE DVV CLARIFICATION BEST PRACTICES HR POLICY MANUAL AWARDS AND RECOGNITION ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES STAKE HOLDERS FEEDBACK INSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTIVENESS DISABLED FRIENDLY CAMPUS CAPACITY BUILDING AND SKILL ENHANCEMENT INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDIT

CRITERION 2 - Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)


Key Indicator - 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.1.1. Enrolment percentage 20
2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years 20

Key Indicator - 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.2.1. Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 40

Key Indicator - 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.3.1. Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing 40

Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.4.1. Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.1.1 Number of Sanctioned posts / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during the last five years
15
2.4.2. Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years
25

Key Indicator - 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.5.1. Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient 40

Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.6.1. Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website 45
2.6.2. Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated
2.6.3. Pass percentage of Students during last five years
2.6.3.1. Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years
2.6.3.2. Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year wise during the last five years
45

Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)


Metric No. Description Weightage
2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60